The Hunter Who Changed His Aim: How the Hunter Became the Protector
By Angela Clark

In the late 1920s, science and sport were entwined: hunters were the naturalists of their time. If a species was rare, the prevailing belief held that nature had already winnowed the weak—so human intervention meant collecting specimens for museums before the species disappeared forever. This mindset was not born of cruelty but of a misunderstood sense of urgency. The idea of preserving fragile animal populations? Almost unheard-of. Conservation was in its infancy, and extinction was viewed less as a tragedy and more as an inevitability. Science, in this era, relied on rifles as much as field journals.

Enter the Hunter—an intrepid explorer born into legacy, the son of a U.S. president who saw the wilderness as a proving ground for masculinity and endurance. This man had been raised on tales of bravery in the Amazon, of charging lions in Africa. From a young age, he had lived in the shadow of a father who had redefined American ruggedness. The Hunter saw no conflict in wielding a rifle in pursuit of discovery. To him, every expedition was an act of both adventure and academic contribution. Each kill was a data point. Each specimen, a story.

In 1928, with the prestigious backing of the Field Museum in Chicago, the Hunter and his brother embarked on what would become known as the Kelley-Roosevelts Asiatic Expedition. Their mission: to explore the mountainous regions of China and Tibet, document wildlife, and hopefully, find proof of a mythical creature that had been described by locals for centuries but remained unknown to Western science. The so-called "giant bear cat"—a strange, lumbering animal covered in black and white fur.

The journey was brutal. The brothers and their team endured snowstorms, treacherous mountain passes, disease, and the constant threat of bandits. Supply chains were unreliable. Language barriers made communication with guides and locals complicated. Yet they pressed on, driven by ambition, reputation, and a genuine sense of scientific duty. And then, after weeks of grueling travel through the mist-shrouded bamboo forests of Sichuan, they found it.

It wasn’t attacking. It wasn’t running. The creature was simply... there. Peaceful. Clumsy. Chewing bamboo with a slow deliberateness that made it seem more cartoonish than feral. It looked almost human in its expression. The Hunter raised his rifle and took the shot.

At the time, the act was praised. Headlines lauded the successful capture of the first Western specimen of what would later be universally known as the giant panda. The body was preserved and shipped back to the United States, destined for display and dissection. The mission was declared a success by every measurable standard of the day. The brothers became celebrities of a sort, their names etched into the history of zoological discovery.

Yet something shifted within the Hunter. The thrill of the kill had faded quickly, replaced by a gnawing discomfort. He couldn’t stop thinking about the panda. It had posed no threat. It had shown no fear. It had simply existed—gentle, rare, and entirely vulnerable. The shot echoed not just through the forest, but through the conscience of the man who had pulled the trigger.

That moment marked a quiet unraveling of old beliefs. He began to question the practices he had once considered noble. Was scientific advancement truly worth the price of life? Could knowledge coexist with compassion? Was it possible that humanity had a role not just in studying the world, but in protecting it?

Author Nathalia Holt explores this emotional shift in her compelling book, The Beast in the Clouds: The Roosevelt Brothers' Deadly Quest to Find the Mythical Giant Panda. Through her research, Holt uncovers the complexity of the brothers' journey—not just through the physical terrain of China, but through the philosophical terrain of early conservation thought. She paints a vivid picture of men torn between the values of their era and the emerging sense that some creatures were not meant for bullet points in a museum catalog.

As the years passed, the Hunter began to speak out more frequently on behalf of animals. His voice, once used to regale rooms with tales of conquests, now called for restraint. He urged scientists and collectors to consider alternatives. He lobbied for preservation, education, and sustainable approaches to studying wildlife. His public stance marked a radical departure from the legacy he had inherited—and, until that point, upheld.

And then, in 1935, the transformation became official. The Hunter was appointed President of the National Audubon Society. It was a stunning development: a man once known for trophy hunts now stood at the helm of one of the most respected conservation organizations in the country. Under his leadership, the Society broadened its mission, taking stronger stances on habitat preservation, bird protection, and environmental awareness. He didn't just change his mind—he changed the conversation.

Finally, the moment of truth:

The Hunter was Kermit Roosevelt Sr., son of President Theodore Roosevelt. Once a symbol of rugged American exploration, Kermit’s journey into the Chinese wilderness led to something far greater than scientific acclaim. It led to reflection. To humility. And to a legacy not of domination, but of protection.

The panda was once a target. Because of Kermit Roosevelt, it became a symbol.

Recommended reading: The Beast in the Clouds: The Roosevelt Brothers' Deadly Quest to Find the Mythical Giant Panda by Nathalia Holt (Atria, July 2025). With vivid storytelling and scholarly precision, Holt traces the expedition that changed the course of conservation history—and the conscience of one of its most unlikely champions.

Have a story of your own twist of fate? Share it with us—and it might just inspire our next episode.